tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20173285.post116921580019741157..comments2024-03-25T09:43:27.402-04:00Comments on Divrei Chaim: sefeika derabbanan l'kulaChaim B.http://www.blogger.com/profile/02231811394447584320noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20173285.post-1169536522718462402007-01-23T02:15:00.000-05:002007-01-23T02:15:00.000-05:00RAv Elchonon has a piece on this in BAba kamma on ...RAv Elchonon has a piece on this in BAba kamma on the shilia sfek sfaikah and the yemei tahara is the vlad a boy or girl and what day did the shilyah come out.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20173285.post-1169348472885222112007-01-20T22:01:00.000-05:002007-01-20T22:01:00.000-05:00Anonymous, please see previous post.Anonymous, please see previous post.Chaim B.https://www.blogger.com/profile/02231811394447584320noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20173285.post-1169346910255786722007-01-20T21:35:00.000-05:002007-01-20T21:35:00.000-05:00WE dont apply sofek doraisia Lekula if its going t...WE dont apply sofek doraisia Lekula if its going to pator you up totaly from the mitzvahAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20173285.post-1169227941567716182007-01-19T12:32:00.000-05:002007-01-19T12:32:00.000-05:00I need to mull thus one over...why in the Beitzah ...I need to mull thus one over...why in the Beitzah case would you not say that the concept of shinuy is a given (just like haseiba), and this issue simply is whether is applies to salt, or also to spices, and under what conditions? The net result is any limitation of the shinuy requirement could be seen as a pure kula also.Chaim B.https://www.blogger.com/profile/02231811394447584320noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20173285.post-1169227463758560892007-01-19T12:24:00.000-05:002007-01-19T12:24:00.000-05:00I have an off-the-cuff suggestion:In the case of B...I have an off-the-cuff suggestion:<BR/><BR/>In the case of Betza, the chumrot and kulot <I>emerge</I> from different explanations for why grinding spices would be allowed without a shinuy. Neither position is a kula or chumra per se; adopting either one has ramifications that are both stringent and lenient. This makes it impossible to say "safek derabbanan l'kula".<BR/><BR/>By contrast, in the case of Hasseba, the two versions of Rav Nachman in fact involve kulot <I>inherently</I>. One version doesn't extend the institution of hasseba to the last two cups - a leniency - and one does not extend hasseba to the first two - a leniency. Because Rav Nachman is directly dealing with the extent of the institution of hasseba, and is placing limits on its application, we can say he is offering a "kula" in each case by curtailing hasseba. There is no real "chumra" generated here; the existence of hasseba as a concept is a given, so restricting it to only 2 of the cups is just a kula, pure and simple.<BR/><BR/>Thus, the question arises - why can't we rule leniently in both directions, since there is a position that relieves us of the obligation of hasseba on the first two, and another that relieves us of the obligation on the last two? <BR/><BR/>Any thoughts on this approach?<BR/><BR/>By the way, I enjoy these posts very much - they are a wonderful source of intellectual stimulation!Rabbi Joshua Maroofhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12585369620887846940noreply@blogger.com