tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20173285.post2429781716227105043..comments2024-03-25T09:43:27.402-04:00Comments on Divrei Chaim: the bridge between rugalach and the mikdashChaim B.http://www.blogger.com/profile/02231811394447584320noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20173285.post-56301429166103249092018-08-03T07:54:11.064-04:002018-08-03T07:54:11.064-04:00"never an opportunity for 'v'achalta ..."never an opportunity for 'v'achalta v'savata'"<br /><br />(but Shemos 16:12, at morning sated with bread!?) <br />one could likewise ask, does a kezayit of lechem satisfy the kishkes? or does it mean that by the mon, one must be satisfied that His G-d has shown compassion, and that by the kezayit, he must express his satisfaction that the given land is productive?<br /><br />"Moshe instituted the text of the first bracha"<br /><br />hard to hear that; since when does Moshe speak in such universal terms as those of the first bracha? indeed, in Bamidbar 11:21-22, he struggles to get his head around the prospect of a new mass feeding of bnei Yisrael. on the other hand, the mon manifests bamidbar, in no-man's land, where any man is every man (ie. of universal identity), though it seems unlikely that Moshe would ever ever thus democratize his people [vilify, yes, democratize, no]<br /><br />"suddenly*...speaking...about the mikdash"<br /><br />no surprise given Devarim 8:9, iron & copper,as per Divrei haYomim I.22:3,4, and D.Y. II.4:1<br /><br />*Ben ZigZag asks, 'can rugalach suddenly alter one's speech?'. his answer-- 'this is Russian rugalach, and we know that they tamper with everything, even Jewish Election...'alonzo maccabihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13177738305527364094noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20173285.post-17025336738920823352018-08-02T23:03:28.965-04:002018-08-02T23:03:28.965-04:00The second berakhhah, I would agree, is thanking H...The second berakhhah, I would agree, is thanking Hashem for the land and the third, for Malkhus David, Y-m and the Miqdash. But the first berakhah is hazan es hakol. I don't think what you said applies.<br /><br />(And the fourth berakhah is for all the tovos that even when the Shechinah isn't visible in the land, Y-m or the Miqdash, nor in Malkhus Beis David. Thus coined after Harugei Beitar.)<br /><br />micha bergerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11612144735431285113noreply@blogger.com