tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20173285.post3365734113955990457..comments2024-03-25T09:43:27.402-04:00Comments on Divrei Chaim: a few quick thoughtsChaim B.http://www.blogger.com/profile/02231811394447584320noreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20173285.post-43279744538619978162015-03-05T14:24:56.136-05:002015-03-05T14:24:56.136-05:00I got off track. Chaim asked about the chavilos is...I got off track. Chaim asked about the chavilos issue of giving shalach manos and matanos l'evyonim together. There, of course one could say that despite the disparate halachos of the two, one being rei'us and the other a time specific type of tzedaka, according to many rishonim, they both are basically simcha and rei'us. But that has no shaychus to Hallel and Megilla.Eliezer Eisenberghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16036989084122930226noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20173285.post-368668199324719152015-03-05T12:39:44.635-05:002015-03-05T12:39:44.635-05:00The only pirsuma in Hallel is yetzias mitzrayim. ...The only pirsuma in Hallel is yetzias mitzrayim. Also, ein odom shor shira ela mitoch simcha.<br />Pirsum is not what the neis means - pirsum is about the neis, not part of the neis.<br />Rei'us is the tikum for mefozar u'mforad. Simcha is the corollary of hadar kibluha.<br /><br />And making one shehechiyanu on multiple chronologically-connected mitzvos is hardly unique: Pesach on all the mitzvos hayom, including matzo, marror, hagaddah, hadlakas neiros. Succos on yeshivas succah and asiyasa...great Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15728976902210831137noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20173285.post-18940799678496058282015-03-05T11:49:46.688-05:002015-03-05T11:49:46.688-05:00Hallel=pirsumei nissa, megilla=pirsumei nissa. Si...Hallel=pirsumei nissa, megilla=pirsumei nissa. Simcha may be a necessary catalyst for Shira, but Shira/Hallel≠simcha. This all accepts the premise that Shalach manos is a manifestation of simcha. Maybe it's only rei'us? Unless you mean that Purim has one din of mitzvas hayom, and that din is Simcha + Rei'us, and you fulfill that one din by fulfilling its component elements. To me its more mistavra that there are two mitzvos hayom, simcha and rei'us. I do agree that it is possible that the purpose of this dual mitzva is to generate pirsum haneis.<br /><br />What I really want is a good svara for saying that simcha/pirsum/rei'us all are expressions of the one thing that is essential to what the Neis of Purim means.Eliezer Eisenberghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16036989084122930226noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20173285.post-12134609583688079592015-03-05T07:16:56.396-05:002015-03-05T07:16:56.396-05:00Din in simcha v'rai'us. However, each is ...Din in simcha v'rai'us. However, each is a different aspect thereof. Pirsuma nisa is one type of simcha, as is Hallel [again, see Meiri]. After all, if Megilla <=> Hallel, and Hallel = simcha... However, each one carries aspects unique to its mechanism.<br /><br />See Rav Gustman [first one on Kiddushin] how different mechanisms can complement and subsume each other in creating the same challos [singular, not the ones for Shabbos and Yom Tov].<br /><br />עד דלא ידע בהידורgreat Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15728976902210831137noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20173285.post-644014170049054752015-03-04T21:36:43.232-05:002015-03-04T21:36:43.232-05:00Interesting. This would need explanation, though,...Interesting. This would need explanation, though, something along the lines of "different ways of fulfilling pirsum haneis" or something. It needs more. After all, even the Meiri would not say that if you don't have poor people to give to, you should say Hallel.Eliezer Eisenberghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16036989084122930226noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20173285.post-24348271079356892312015-03-04T14:58:06.738-05:002015-03-04T14:58:06.738-05:00Question: why is this not a problem of doing mitzv...Question: why is this not a problem of doing mitzvos chavilos chavilos? <br /><br />I can only suggest like the gemoro says in pesachim about YAK'N'HAZ. Its all one mitzvah. There are numerous proofs that the four mitzvas of purim are b'etzem one. Two of them are the introduction of the Rambam and the halochoh that you should intend the brochoh on the megilla to also be for the other three mitzvos hayom. This is not really understandable if they are four separate mitzvos.shimon Bhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01485864039495075583noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20173285.post-56715733758950805352015-03-04T10:46:52.910-05:002015-03-04T10:46:52.910-05:00Thank you. I needed that.
However, I was told,...Thank you. I needed that. <br /><br />However, I was told, bo ba'yom, by a talmid who was there, that Rav Nevenzhal rysed kri'ah [I don't remember with or without a brocho] on the day of the Oslo Accords because, he said, until then he had felt that Yerushalyim had a din of b'binyana, and at that moment, he realized otherwise.<br /><br />But...Rav Shachter's ma'amar is indeed uplifting.great Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15728976902210831137noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20173285.post-683702830591717492015-03-04T08:46:05.578-05:002015-03-04T08:46:05.578-05:00http://www.yutorah.org/lectures/lecture.cfm/735796...http://www.yutorah.org/lectures/lecture.cfm/735796/Rabbi_Hershel_Schachter/Land_for_Peace:_A_Halachic_Perspective<br /><br />see p.15 regarding the Ramban's view on churban -- only two, impossible for there to be a third. Chaim B.https://www.blogger.com/profile/02231811394447584320noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20173285.post-73217254927141480032015-03-03T21:22:54.578-05:002015-03-03T21:22:54.578-05:00"Iran does not pose an existential threat to ..."Iran does not pose an existential threat to Israel. Israel will continue to exist (because) [if] that is the ratzon Hashem."<br /><br />There, I fixed it for you.great Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15728976902210831137noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20173285.post-51432405080644315092015-03-03T13:23:20.635-05:002015-03-03T13:23:20.635-05:00Regarding remembering to erase Amaleik, your pshat...Regarding remembering to erase Amaleik, your pshat can explain the Siman in Bava Basra 46b, where before bringing rayos from Areiv, Malveh, Lokei'ach, and Kablan, the Gemara says "Amaleik siman." The Yaavetz in back finds this perplexing. He says<br />חידוש שנתנו סימן כזה במי שנאמר בו תמחה את זכר עמלק אולי מצאו לו רמז מן התורה במאי דסיים קרא לא תשכח שתיבת לא מופסקת בטעם טפחא להורות שיש בו מקום לשכחה ולהתיר להשתמש בו לאוקמי אגרסא דכל מה דאסר שרי להכניס מנוול לבית המדרש לשבר כחו ולהוציא ממנו ניצוץ קדושה שיש בו<br /><br />The Yaavetz also explains some of the behavior one occasionally encounters in Batei Medrash.Eliezer Eisenberghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16036989084122930226noreply@blogger.com