tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20173285.post6557116080124036292..comments2024-03-28T21:21:02.777-04:00Comments on Divrei Chaim: Ramban vs Rambam on the ta'am hamitzvah of korbanos; Chasam Sofer on what Shaul got wrongChaim B.http://www.blogger.com/profile/02231811394447584320noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20173285.post-82246601983732840382016-03-26T19:01:11.057-04:002016-03-26T19:01:11.057-04:00That should be mokom hamikdosh, not beish hamikdos...That should be mokom hamikdosh, not beish hamikdosh.....shimon Bhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01485864039495075583noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20173285.post-86452967669752421552016-03-26T19:00:43.377-04:002016-03-26T19:00:43.377-04:00Have a look in the Rambam Beis Habechira 2,2.
We ...Have a look in the Rambam Beis Habechira 2,2.<br /><br />We have a kabolo that the korbon of Odom, Noach, Kayin and Hevel were all in the beis hamikdosh. Beautiful according to the meshech chochmoh - they wanted a beis hamikdosh type korbon, no need for a bomo type korbon. Why else would noach travel from Har Ararato the mokom hamikdosh?shimon Bhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01485864039495075583noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20173285.post-17536895781064123222016-03-22T15:45:42.905-04:002016-03-22T15:45:42.905-04:00Thank you for zeroing in on what Shaul was thinkin...Thank you for zeroing in on what Shaul was thinking. It always bothered me that he<br />did not follow instructions and lost his rulership.Mcdcohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09406154471044225728noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20173285.post-35233896293073570042016-03-18T00:26:12.397-04:002016-03-18T00:26:12.397-04:00The Meshech Chochma's point, it seems, is that...The Meshech Chochma's point, it seems, is that a bamas yochid when there is a place of greater kedusha is indeed a concession to avodah zarah. If a person's intent was pure closeness to HaShem, the proper place would be at the place of greatest presence of the Shechina. The avoidance of that closeness is inherently slight avodah zarah.<br /><br />OTOH, the examples you gave of the Avos, etc., involved no concept of distance or avoidance. On the contrary, the focus was to bring the Shechina to the bamah. Consider what would have happened if, e.g. according to the Seforno, there had been no Mishkan in the midbar. In that case, a bamah would have had no taint of A"Z.<br /><br />And saying that thinking a chatas is just a bulwark again A"Z is itself an act of rebellion against HaShem is a rather strong indictment of the Rambam according the naive understanding of his shitta.pellehDinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08182620985068790625noreply@blogger.com