tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20173285.post771273604255309350..comments2024-03-28T21:21:02.777-04:00Comments on Divrei Chaim: Ptur ones in kiyum Hamitzvos (II)Chaim B.http://www.blogger.com/profile/02231811394447584320noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20173285.post-2083436043138713672019-08-06T13:56:51.987-04:002019-08-06T13:56:51.987-04:00Great answer! Very well done application to tvilas...Great answer! Very well done application to tvilas keilim.<br /><br />(Reminiscent of the Tzlach on davar she-yesh lo matirin.)<br /><br /> Sasshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04496949945435213987noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20173285.post-39548170254302976692019-08-04T13:24:47.333-04:002019-08-04T13:24:47.333-04:00I'd love to hear the answer explained further,...I'd love to hear the answer explained further, please! <br /><br />I understand (I think) the Steipler's distinction. But if ones is a sufficient excuse to not perform a mitzva *at all* (like wearing a four-cornered garment on Shabbat w/o tzitzis), then kal va-chomer shouldn't ones also be a sufficient excuse to merely *delay* a mitzva by 1 day for kisui ha-dam and tvilas keilim??Stevenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14371365602074869132noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20173285.post-37960771795632974912019-08-03T14:34:39.440-04:002019-08-03T14:34:39.440-04:00does this analogy persevere?
the wearer of the 4-...does this analogy persevere?<br /><br />the wearer of the 4-cornered garment benefits from its coverage, its 'garment function', even in the absence of tzitzis; if we switch the shechting and toiveling examples from cheftza to gavra, can the same be said regarding hana'ah? the mitzvah to enjoy meat on Yom Tov-- if one delays shechting in order to get the mitzvah of kisuy ha'dam tomorrow, will he yet benefit from the 'food function' of the chayah today [despite the meat mitzvah lost]? if there is now, for Shabbos kiddush, only one cup in the entire household, of metal, made outside of Israel, yet to be immersed, will that cup still serve for drinking water (though not for kiddush), that is, still fulfill its 'drinking vessel function' today [despite the mitzvah lost vis-a-vis this very cup {this very tallis}]?alonzo maccabihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13177738305527364094noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20173285.post-91159626269288241612019-08-02T10:32:21.755-04:002019-08-02T10:32:21.755-04:00About "petur oneis"... Interesting (to m...About "petur oneis"... Interesting (to me, anyway), just this morning I encountered an Arukh haShulchan where RYME argues that a given case cannot be describing a man who lacks a forearm as being patur in tefillin, as it's a physical impossibility. Rather, the word "patur" is taken as proof that the case isn't oneis. Although compulsion oneis might be different than impossibility.<br /><br />AhS OC 27:6 uses this as one of his arguments that the case must be where the person is missing a forearm, but the arm is intact above the elbow.micha bergerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11612144735431285113noreply@blogger.com