tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20173285.post8813230987074120189..comments2024-03-28T21:21:02.777-04:00Comments on Divrei Chaim: do we need permission of the UN to rebuild the Mikdash?Chaim B.http://www.blogger.com/profile/02231811394447584320noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20173285.post-24828860295733995832007-05-17T18:14:00.000-04:002007-05-17T18:14:00.000-04:00I have to correct that, I could not find it there....I have to correct that, I could not find it there. I'll have to look some more. What I do know for certain is that in a Kuntress on matters of the Geula called MiMayenei HaYeshua, by a son of a Talmid of the GRA, based on his teachings, it says that the Three Oaths preclude us from building the Mikdash without Rishyon HaUmmos. Where it is in the GRA on Shur HaShirim - I have to look some more. Sorry for the wrong Mareh Makom.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20173285.post-38647760150543069372007-05-16T20:13:00.000-04:002007-05-16T20:13:00.000-04:00On Shir HaShirim 2:7 .On Shir HaShirim 2:7 .Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20173285.post-73763449175087596742007-05-16T17:54:00.000-04:002007-05-16T17:54:00.000-04:00I did not know that - can you point me to where he...I did not know that - can you point me to where he says this? Thank you!Chaim B.https://www.blogger.com/profile/02231811394447584320noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20173285.post-84313789677104809542007-05-16T16:16:00.000-04:002007-05-16T16:16:00.000-04:00The GRA in his commentary to Shir HaShirim re the ...The GRA in his commentary to Shir HaShirim re the Three Oaths refers explicitly to the Mikdash as something we are not allowed to build without Rishyon HaUmmos.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20173285.post-15349503956548104272007-05-15T22:57:00.000-04:002007-05-15T22:57:00.000-04:00Perhaps, as the Galut is characterized by the oppr...Perhaps, as the Galut is characterized by the oppression of the Gentiles, the end of the Galut will be marked by some sort of formal acknowledgement that there will be no more oppression. Or another perhaps--there will be some formal promise by the nations that they will never again come with war against the Sanctuary.<BR/><BR/>But I'm not sure those would qualify as purely halachic considerations. Perhaps he was factoring in the adjurations of Shir haShirim (on which he did himself write a commentary)??Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20173285.post-81854160952110773412007-05-15T19:18:00.000-04:002007-05-15T19:18:00.000-04:00Michtav m'Eliyahu=R' Eliyahu Guttmacher. The Ramb...Michtav m'Eliyahu=R' Eliyahu Guttmacher. The Ramban learns one tochacha is for bayis rishon, one bayis sheni (and there will never be another churban). But the Netziv is saying a halacha l'doros, not a unique circumstance to churban bayis rishonm - see his kashe from zevachim.Chaim B.https://www.blogger.com/profile/02231811394447584320noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20173285.post-87409079197644321762007-05-15T18:08:00.000-04:002007-05-15T18:08:00.000-04:00I could be wrong, but wasn't Michtav Me-Eliyahu R'...I could be wrong, but wasn't Michtav Me-Eliyahu R' Dessler?Ezra Seligsohnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01735103557132338627noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20173285.post-49096584267002768362007-05-15T11:12:00.000-04:002007-05-15T11:12:00.000-04:00R. Eliyahu Gutmacher, in his Michtav Me-Eliyahu no...R. Eliyahu Gutmacher, in his Michtav Me-Eliyahu notes to Derishas Tziyon, points out that according to the Ramban and Rabbenu Bachya, the pasuk of "ve-hashimosi..." is referring to the galus following Bayis Rishon.Gil Studenthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12776831546758682126noreply@blogger.com