Saturday, December 31, 2005
Chezkas Mamon (II)
The gemara at the beginning of Elu Metziyus (B.M. 21) raises a question of whether one is obligated in hashavas aveida in certain cases, and leaves the safek unresolved. The Rosh paskens on these cases that safeika d'oraysa l'chumra and one is obligated to announce the avieda. Why would we not treat this issue as a safeik mamon and say that the finder has become the muchzak in absence of any demand to return it? The Kuntres HaSefekos (6:9) suggests here as well that we only apply chezkas mamon where the issue at hand is a safek in metziyus. Where the issue is one of sadek in din, we apply sfeika d'oraysa l'chumra. (See the Rosh in perek 2 of machshirim re: rov yisrael).
Looking for information and found it at this great site... Flint michigan voyeurs Buy a car at best price
ReplyDeleteCool blog, interesting information... Keep it UP Alltel prepaid cell phone monthly plans vw Buffy boots Sales viagra Buddge car covers kia hot naked milfs evolutions of internet advertising air purifier review dresses for less jenna jameson nude Washer wireing diagrans Credit mortgages laptop apple Cadillac custom grills Folding chair beds lomita facial hair removal car covers
ReplyDelete