Question #1: What was the hava amina and what was the maskana? At the end of the day, the tribes of Ephraim
and Menashe still produced the evil kings Achav, Rechavam, Yehu. If that’s what gave Ya’akov pause and
prevented his giving brachos in the first place, then what changed?
Question #2: According to Rashi (48:9), Yosef’s tefilah for rachamim
had an effect on the outcome. So why was
it only Yosef that davened? If Ya’akov
sensed that something was preventing him from giving brachos to his grandchildren,
why didn’t he daven on their behalf?
Once again I have questions but no real satisfying answers (the
Shem m’Shmuel discusses the issue, but I don’t understand what he is saying well
enough).
So far all I have is this: Ya’akov paused not because in the
future there would be evil kings that come from Ephraim and Menashe, but rather
because that future forced him to question whether there was something wrong in
the present. Perhaps there was something
lurking below the surface, an invisible defect not worthy of bracha, that was
invisible now, but whose presence would come out in later generations.
As we discussed once before, a bracha can’t make someone into
something he/she is not. All it can do
is help bring out the kochos a person already has inside.
The resolution of Ya’akov’s dilemma therefore had to come from
Yosef himself. Yosef showed his wife’s
kesubah, proving that despite living in a promiscuous society, he was married k’das
Moshe v’Yisrael. Yosef was the one who
davened for rachamim on his children, proving his concern and investment in their
spiritual welfare. What will be in the
future is kavshei Rachamana, but Yosef showed his father that what was before
him in the here and now was fit for bracha.
Anyone have a better approach?
Famous questions. I believe the answer can be found in Ramban by שרש פרה ראש ולענה where he discusses והוליד בן פריץ. This question is age old regarding every tzadik who begets a rasha. Your answer works for me.
ReplyDelete