Ramban disagrees and brings many proofs that the second shem, the Y-K-V-K, refers to Hashem’s attribute of mercy.
Maybe the machlokes here is whether the shem should be interpreted
based only on how it is read, i.e. Elokim=justice, or whether it should be interpreted
in light of how it is written, i.e. Y-K-V-K = mercy.
This is reminiscent of (though not exactly parallel to) the
machlokes between Mechaber and GR”A in O.C. siman 5 regarding kavanah when reading shem Hashem. According to the Mechaber, when saying the
shem Hashem one must have kavanah for the midah of the shem as
written, not just as pronounced.
Even though the shem Y-K-V-K is read as the shem of Adnus,
according to the Mechaber one must also have in mind the meaning of Y-K-V-K,
that G-d is eternal and is in past, present and future. According to GR”A, one need only have in mind
the idea of Adnus, the name as pronounced, not the Y-K-V-K as written.
The chakira raised by both the Rav and the Brisker Rav regarding what the gemara means when it darshens that we are supposed to
pronounce the shem Adnus when we see Y-K-V-K may hinge on this issue. Does the gemara mean that
since we can’t read Y-K-V-K, we ba’al peh substitute the shem Adnus when we see
those letters, or does the gemara means the shem Adnus is the way to
read/pronounce Y-K-V-K?
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteIn the thirteen years since you wrote this, you will have seen Reb Moshe's teshuva on this issue in OC I 32:6 at the end and OC IV:24. True, the Pr"M in E"A 141:9 says you can read it baal peh, but the Shaarei Ephraim Shaar 3:3 says the contrary, that you have to look inside. Only Reb Moshe is toleh on the machlokes Tosfos and Rabbeinu Hillel. You, of course, are the first (to my knowledge) to connect this with the machlokes Rashi and Ramban here.
ReplyDelete