With
how he opens Hil Kri’as Shema:
In
the former case the Rambam gives us an active voice statement that there is a
command to daven every day, but in the latter case the Rambam gives us a
passive voice description of what people do every day – read shema – without mentioning
any command. Why the difference?
Lechem
Mishna explains that the mitzvah of shema is about more than simply reciting a
parsha. The mitzvah is really yichud
Hashem, acknowledging and accepting that G-d is one. Since that mitzvah of yichud Hashem applies
24x7, therefore the Rambam did not want to write that the mitzvah of shema applies only
twice daily.
The
GR”A is medayek from the first mishna in Brachos that there is no din of shome’a
k’oneh by kri’as shema. Perhaps the
reason why is because shomea k’oneh applies only to mitzvos that involve recitation
of a text. The mitzvah of kri’as shema
is not about reciting a text, but is about the kabbalas ol of yichud Hashem the
words are supposed to engender.
2. Last
week I mentioned the Yalkut that learns from Moshe’s tefilah of va’eschanan
that one should pray even in a time of tzarah and I quoted as hesber from the
Chasam Sofer as to why davka this incident is the source for that idea. The sefer Dudai Reuvain from R’ Reuvain Katz
has a simpler explanation. Chazal tell
us that Moshe Rabeinu davened 515 tefilos to be able to enter Eretz Yisrael. At that point Hashem commanded him to stop praying
because he did not want to let him go. Why
did Hashem need to command Moshe to stop?
Just like Hashem did not respond to the first 515 tefilos, he could not ignore
the 516th as well?!
We
from here, writes R’ Katz, the tremendous power of tefilah. Even though Hashem had made a gezeirah, had
Moshe been able to keep davening, he would have gotten his way. Tefilah is not a mystical reward that Hashem
gives out if and when he chooses – it’s a metizyus built into reality. When you daven as much as necessary, it elicits
a response. That’s the unique lesson of
our parsha that the Yalkut is teaching us.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI need to modify what I wrote.
ReplyDeleteI said that in light of your diyuk in the Rambam. it's interesting to think about the machhlokes Mishna Berura and Chazon Ish whether there's a din of baal tosif on Krias Shma. What I need to modify is that I said Reb Moshe holds like the Mishna Berura, but in fact he is very mesupak, precisely because of the svara the Chazon Ish brought up.
Mareh makom for the Mishna Berura and Chazon Ish:
http://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=46112&st=&pgnum=365.
Mareh Makom for Reb Moshe: OC II:60
http://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=14675&st=&pgnum=253