V'atah hafkeid es halevi'im... v'saviv lamishkan yachanu (1:50)
V'halevi'im yachanu saviv lamishkan... (1:53)
Why the repitition?
Earlier in the week I pointed out that the inclusion of the din of shmiras hamikdash in Mes Midos shows that it is a din in the tzuras habayis, not a chiyuv avodah incumbent upon the levi'im.
The Brisker Rav says it's both, and that's why we have 2 pesukim.
In the first pasuk the din of camping around the mishkan appears in the context of "heim yis'u es hamishkan v'heim yisharsuhu" -- the avodah of leviim.
In the second pasuk it appears In the context of "v'chanu Bnei Yisrael..." -- the tzurah of the encampment.
Similarly, there are two different halachos in the Rambam. In Beis haBechira 7:11 the Rambam describes the 3 machanos in the midbar and he quotes the pasuk of "saviv la'mishkan yachanu" as the source for establishing a machaneh levi'ah. This is a din in the tzurah if the encampment.
In Klei haMikdash 3:2 the Rambam writes "avodah she'lahen hi she'yi'hiyu shomrim es hamikdash" -- shemira is an avodah job assigned to the levi'im.
so the Brisker Rav takes 1:53 for "the tzurah of [general] encampment", while Rambam uses 1:50-- doesn't the former pasuk better serve*, as it refers to bnei Yisrael too [and not only to leviim (1:50)]?
ReplyDelete*in a blindfold 'taste' test, Reuven (the Brisker) vs Shimon (Rambam)