The development of Torah she’ba’al peh, says the Netziv,
reached its peak during the time period of the Second Temple. Therefore, the yetzer ha’ra made its presence
known davka in evil speech, gossip, and slander which was spread by and
effected even talmidei chachamim. This is the sinas chinam that led to the churban.
I guess when you combine the kedusha of Eretz Yisrael with the
kedusha of limud haTorah you get a double-whammy dose of yetzer ha’ra (is that maybe why it says "Nachamu, Nachamu..." 2x?), which may
be why the discourse over the current issues in Eretz Yisrael has degenerated
to the point of farce.
B’shlama the usual so called “frum” websites, which in my view
are worse for your neshoma that even the NY Times because you know it is
acheinu Bnei Yisrael writing every dig and every silly comment, neicha that there are those commentators who use the most warped sevaros and “thinking” to defend any
statement, no matter how repulsive and outrageous, given that it came out of the mouth of
someone that people identify as a gadol.
With enough “lomdus” you can justify any conclusion. Everyone knows that most of the chatter is stam
am ha’aratzus.
But yesterday I was sitting at another Tisha b’Av kinus (not the
one from the previous post) and I had to check with my wife (who was also
there) afterwards to make sure I heard one of the speakers straight. This chashuv Rosh Yeshiva quoted R’
Elchanan’s Ma’amarim as explaining that anyone who wages war against Torah, as is currently happening in Eretz Yisrael, is following Amalek, as that is Amalek's agenda. Maybe he
had something else entirely in mind (I am still trying to be dan l'kaf zechus), and I am obviously only paraphrasing here, but coming a few days after another Rav in
Eretz Yisrael called anyone who wears a kipa seruga Amalek, one cannot help but
draw the connection. The original
comment from earlier in the week has since been “clarified” – it’s not everyone
who wears a kipa seruga, it’s just some of those folks – as if somehow that
makes it better. Is this what things
have come to?!?! We are not talking
about a shverr Tosfos that you say a sevara from a Koveitz Shiurim to be
meyasheiv – we are talking about using R’ Elchanan’s words (and hopefully I am
not crossing a line myself in saying that there is no shortage of kanu’us in
the Koveitz Ma’amarim) as a means of labeling members of Klal Yisrael as equal
to our greatest enemies.
And so what (as some have suggested) if it is meant as a derasha and not
as a provocation to commit genocide – do the words used derech derush have no
meaning anymore?
Maybe I should say baruch Hashem?
Yes, baruch Hashem that we in the Five Towns, not always thought of as
the most yeshivishe community, have now risen to a level of ruchniyus that
allows us to call other Jews “Amalek.”
An achievement indeed.
Again, hopefully this particular Rosh Yeshiva meant something else entirely. At least let me pretend that he did. But why play even close to the third rail? Why are we speaking of Amalek when discussing these issues? Why should we even have to debate who said what and what they meant?
Again, hopefully this particular Rosh Yeshiva meant something else entirely. At least let me pretend that he did. But why play even close to the third rail? Why are we speaking of Amalek when discussing these issues? Why should we even have to debate who said what and what they meant?
In my not humble opinion, if you are reading R’ Elchanan’s
Mamamarim for insight into current events, you miss the picture entirely. Eretz Yisrael of 2013 is not the Eretz
Yisrael of 80 or 90 years ago. Religious
Zionism is a reality that has proven itself.
It may have been possible to speculate back then that a synthesis of
Zionism with a Torah outlook would fail, but today, chush makchish, anyone with
eyes can see that it has not happened. I
remember once reading on R’ Aviner’s blog that a relative of his learning in a
right-wing yeshiva came to Merkaz haRav for a visit and was shocked to see guys
learning in the beis medrash at 1:00AM (and he would have seen the
same in Gush, in KBY, and in so many other places.) His whole life he had been told that the
dati-leumi don’t have Torah, and here his eyes told him otherwise. Chush makchish – it is very hard to maintain
the illusion that religious Zionism is ma’aseh satan, that its adherents are
Amalek, when the talmidei chachamim, the committed bnei Torah produced by the system, prove
otherwise. Similarly, you can scream about breaches
of tniyus all day long, but when you see a Youtube video of people throwing
rocks are little girls who are wearing skirts and blouses that would pass
muster in any of our Beis Ya’akovs in the US, then chush makchish. Is a person supposed to ignore his eyes and
mind and say “afilu omrim al yemin she’hu smol,” that it’s all a false illusion
designed to mislead?
I have no idea how things ultimately will play out in Eretz
Yisrael. The journey, however, is making
for a very bumpy ride.
No comments:
Post a Comment