Sunday, September 17, 2006

tshuvah b'lev and hester panim

Despite the admission of the chotei that "al ki ein Elokei b'kirbi m'tza'uni kol hara'os ha'eilah", that punishment is only because of cheit which drove the Shechina away, Parshas Nitzavim writes that Hashem will remain hidden, "Anochi haster astir panai." Why is the chotei's admission not sufficient tshuvah to remove punishment and hester panim? Ramban answers that the admission is not complete viduy, but is just a "hirhur halev", a thought of tshuvah without a complete committment or verbel confession.
The gemara in Kiddushin (49) writes that if one is mekadesh a woman on the condition that he is a tzadik gamur, the kiddushin is valid "shema hirher tshuvah b'libo", because perhaps at that moment of kiddushin the mekadesh had in his heart a thought of tshuvah which is sufficient to establish a status as tzadik. The implication of the gemara is that hirhurei tshuvah, thoughts of tshuvah, are a fulfillment of the mitzvah of tshuvah!
I am not sure that this poses a problem for the Ramban. Perhaps through hirhurei tshuvah one can attain the status of tzadik in the sense of negating prior sins and removing punishment. However, (and I think this is implied by a careful reading of the Ramban on the parsha), one is still lacking the relationship with Hashem that could have been forged had the time of cheit been spent engaged in Torah and mitzvos. Hester panim is not a punishment in the same sense of the other punishments of the parsha; hester is an absense of presence and and absence of any relationship. For that rift to be repaired requires more than a hirhur b'lev; it demands tshuvah with viduy and a total committment of ahavah.

3 comments:

  1. I would suggest that hester panim is not only absence of presence, but presence of absence. This is more than cute wordplay. Until we do teshuvah--which word in its base sense implies a movement--we are in a sense absenting our presence from the Divine Presence (that is, not only does it cause the Divine Presence to remove Itself from us, but we are "removing" ourselves from It). And it takes complete teshuvah to correct this act of absence--hirhurie teshuvah merely stops the motion away from the Divine Presence, and keeps the distance from getting worse; but teshuvah shelemah is required to abolish the distance and allow us to fully return to the Divine Presence.

    And I'd like to take this opportunity to wish you a "shana tovah" and to thank you for all the learning you've made possible for me since I found your blog this year.

    (Jeffrey Smith)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bill Selliger9:47 AM

    RJBS has a nice vort on this gemara in Kiddushin. The Derech Pikudecha (B'nai Yissaschar on Chumash) asks: The gemara in Yoma says the t'shuva alone is "toleh" for many sins, and one has to wait until Y"K, etc. for his gravest sins to be forgiven. If so, how could the rasha who is m'harher t'shuva be considered a tzaddik immediately?! RJBS answers that there is a difference between a tzaddik and a maishev. A tzaddik is one who will no longer transgress; a maishev is one who has not transgressed. They are independent entities.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The way I have heard it: mafkiya shem rasha (=gem in kiddushin) vs. kabbalah al ha'asid.

    ReplyDelete