Here we see a perfect example of the paradoxical nature of man so often stressed by the ba'alei mussar. Bnei Yisrael wanted to have degalim like angels, yet at the same time Moshe saw that they would bicker like children over whatever plan he would have to carry that out. We can reach for the greatest heights while at the same time being plagued by the basest desires and temptations. Why? Because as great as our intellectual achievement and ambition, at the end of the day we remain tied to our own base humanity. We unfortunately see this again and again in our day and age when people who contribute time and effort to building mosdos and doing great things are featured on the front pages of newspapers being led away in handcuffs.
So much for the hava amina of the Midrash. What are we to make of its conclusion? So what if years earlier the brothers arranged themselves in a certain pattern when they carried Ya'akov's bier -- why should the Shevatim in the desert accept the same arrangement? Ya'akov's funeral was an extraordinary circumstance, a one time event -- why would what was done then set precedent for what should be done generations later? I think the simplest answer is that precedent, even when adopted under extraordinary circumstances, is very hard to break. Once something is done even once, even is a unique circumstance, change becomes more difficult than simply accepting what was done.as the norm.
Any better answers? I've seen a few, but nothing that has grabbed me yet.
Doesn't the midrash say that Yaakov promised that if they followed his request, then Hashem would grant them flags in the midbar in the same configuration? It seems that the set order was part of the reward.
ReplyDeleteBy the way, R' Elya Lopian says the exact same thought in Lev Eliyahu.
but doesn't precedent often run
ReplyDeletecounter where "children" are
involved? "Dan & Asher & Naftali
rode in the front seat last time;
now it's OUR turn!!"
notably, Hashem doesn't say to
Moshe, "don't worry, when I-- Lord, Maker of heaven & earth, Who
redeems --tell bnei Yisrael in parashah bamidbar, 'CAMP EAST.', they'll camp east"; He calms His point-man instead by reference to the filial piety of the tribal fathers during funeral proceedings, as if that
gives Him more satisfaction than
their ultimate piety (than their
submission to Him){if so, would that reflect on the Chizkuni as
presented here 4/28/11, on the hava
amina of kibud av doche shabbos
d'rabbanan?}...compare to Rashi on
bereishis 1:26-- "as I consulted My
subordinates then, I'll show Moshe only (the case of) Yaakov now"... but also compare to Yisro's judges,
as if to say, "let Yaakov 'judge' this one; I'll take the bigger balaganim"...
Bnei Yisrael were surely aware that maaseh Avos siman l'Banim.
ReplyDeleteIf the 12 sons taking their father up out of Egypt was symbolic of their redemption then they would fall in line to ensure the success of their enterprise.
Or one could look at is from a different point of view, that of tradition. One of the strengths (and sometimes weaknesses) of our ancestors was the strength of their tribal loyalites. One could therefore say: This is were papa Naftali stood? Then we will stand there too!
thank you all for the interesting feedback!
ReplyDelete