Ramban notes that Sefer BaMidbar does not contain many
mitzvos; it’s mostly the story of Bnei Yisrael’s travels through the
midbar.
Chasam Sofer writes that if
there are few halachos l’doros in nigleh that we can take away from the sefer,
it means there is a hidden nistar meaning that we are meant to take away.
I
guess we could also say that we need to take away hashkafa, midos,
mussar, deyos, etc.
Just as we darshen every detail in the text to extrapolate halacha, so too,
we need to invest the same effort in attending to the details of the text to find
the messages that are being taugh to us in those other areas as well.
Look at what the Netziv was able to find in the details of how
the klei hamishkan were packed up for travel:
1)
All
the kelim are described as being wrapped in techeiles and then covered with some
other outer covering, with the exception of the aron, where techeiles was shown
on the outside.
Techeiles reminds us of
heaven; it represents G-d’s revealed hashgacha.
The klei hamishkan, the shulchan, the mizbeiach, etc. serve as symbols
of malchus, wealth, kehunah, etc. (the details are not important).
In all of these areas G-d’s presence lurks
beneath the surface.
The casual observer
thinks a king holds real power; he does not realize that Hashem is the one who
behind the scenes directs the affairs of state.
The casual observer sees wealth and thinks
the rich man is lucky in business; he does not see that it’s all because of
Hashem’s bracha.
The only exception in
the aron.
When it comes to Torah, Hashem’s
hashgacha and bracha are obvious in what makes a talmid chacham who he
is.
2) Usually
the pesukim first refer to the kli being taken and then the techeiles covering,
e.g. “
V’al shulchan hapanim yifrisu begged techeiles…” (4:7), “
V’al mizbach ha’zahav
yifrisu begged techeiles…” (4:11)
The
exception is the menorah, where the pasuk says “
V’lakchu begged techeiles v’kisu
es menoas ha’maor…” (4:9)
In most areas
of life you have to work hard until you get somewhere and then Hashem will
respond in kind with his extra hashgacha.
In talmud torah, which is what the light of the menorah represents, one
needs that special siyata d’shemaya before becoming a gadol or a big talmid
chacham.
Without it, one can never get
there.
3) The
kelim of the mizbeiach were all wrapped separately from the mizbeiach itself,
but not so the menorah, where everything was wrapped together in one bundle.
A leader must often stand alone, apart and
above the crowd.
A rebbe, however, must
be inseperable from his talmidim.
For #3 above ("a rebbe, however, must be inseperable from his talmidim") -- which is a very beautiful explanation and message -- we suggested two additional explanations at our Shabbat table:
ReplyDeletea. if the menorah represents the light of Torah, the "utensils" of the menorah can symbolize its supporters. Keeping the menorah and its utensils close together symbolizes the classic message of the equal importance and merit of Yissachar and Zevulun.
b. One of my son's came up with this, which I love (!): the light of the menorah represents the shechina (chazal like to say ner ma’aravi especially represented the shechina), and the utensils represent His servants – Israel, or tzaddikim. The overall message is that even when the shechina is concealed, e.g. during exile when the mikdash is dismantled and the Jewish people move from place to place, underneath the veils Hashem remains intimately close to His servants.
I like your son's pshat!
ReplyDelete