Thursday, August 22, 2013

Rogatchover on the "tov" promised to Yisro

In Parshas Beha’alosecha Moshe asks his father-in-law Yisro to travel with Klal Yisrael to Eretz Yisrael and promises that, “V’haya hatov ha’hu asher yeitiv Hashem imanu v’heitavnu lach” (Bamidbar 10:32).  What is this “tov,” this good thing, that Moshe promised?  If you read yesterday’s post you probably have a good idea of the answer. 

The mitzvah of bikurim entails “v’smachta b’kol hatov” – bikurim are called “tov.”  The gemara (Archin 11a) even has a hava amina that the pasuk that refers to avodah “b’simcha u’vtuv leivav,” from where we learn shiras haLevi’im, is perhaps instead referring to bringing bikurim, since they are also called tov. 

What Moshe was promising Yisro, writes the Rogatchover, was the opportunity to bring bikurim.  The Yerushalmi (Bikurim 1:4, 3a in the Vilna ed) writes:

ובני קיני חותן משה מביאין וקורין דכתיב (במדבר י) לכה אתנו והטבנו לך.

When Rashi in Beha’alosecha writes that Yisro was given a portion of land near Yiricho for safekeeping, it doesn’t mean the land itself is the tov that Moshe promised.  In light of the Y-lmi what Rashi means is that since Yisro’s descendants were able to meet the necessary precondition of owning land, therefore they could fulfill the mitzvah of bikuim, "v'samachta b’kol hatov."

4 comments:

  1. Nice. So why not say it refers to תורת ארץ ישראל, אין טוב אלא תורה?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Wouldn't the gemara in Archin 11 answer your question? - "m'samchei lev ikrei, tov lo ikrei." (Tos there asks what to do with "lekach tov...")

    ReplyDelete
  3. Maybe, because a different son-in-law of Yisro was Elazar ben Ahron Hakohen, those descendents of Yisro received bikurim (as Kohanim). Not muchrach, but interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Maybe, because a different son-in-law of Yisro was Elazar ben Ahron Hakohen, those descendents of Yisro received bikurim (as Kohanim). Not muchrach, but interesting.

    ReplyDelete